 |
Wisconsin
Among Four States Involved in Hosted Taxation Testing
Four
states--Kansas, Michigan, North Carolina and Wisconsin--will
test an Internet-based tax calculation and remission system
using software and services from several vendors. E-businesses
in these states should be observing these tests closely, as
the systems being tested may represent a cost-effective way to
manage the complexities of evolving tax code, particularly in
an e-business setting.
Multi-state Effort
The tests are part of a multi-state effort to take paperwork
out of tax administration for merchants and tax authorities.
However, it also aims to recover tax dollars that may
otherwise slip through the cracks of interstate and Internet
commerce
Sales and Use Taxes
"We're advising all E-business customers to begin taking
steps to prepare for a world in which they are collecting and
remitting sales and use taxes," said AbsoluteBusiness LLC
Co-Founder and President Stephen Neils, though he cautioned
that Internet-based tax-compliance systems won't be in broad
use for years.
Another Acronym: SSTP?
In December of 2000, a committee comprising representatives of
29 states approved a plan, called the Streamlined
Sales Tax Project (SSTP), to create uniformity in the way
states administer sales and use taxes. Federal leaders have
failed so far to reach consensus on how to manage taxation in
an electronic age, which has led to a moratorium on new
Internet sales taxes that ends October 2001. But several bills
that would force retailers to collect sales taxes are pending
in Congress, so states are plowing ahead.
The SSTP test involves tax collection and management software
from Taxware, Vertex and esalestax.com. The software is being
integrated by Pitney Bowes Inc. and Hewlett-Packard. Merchants
will send live sales transaction data in real time using the
Internet to one of four systems in the pilot. The number of
merchants participating and the length of the pilots weren't
disclosed.
A System For the Buyer, Seller or State?
Here's how the system would function: After a consumer
initiates an online purchase, the e-business site would use
the Internet to access a trusted third-party hosting provider
that would determine sales or use taxes on the purchase, based
on the locations of the buyer and the seller, as well as
applicable state and local tax laws.
The
third party would be responsible for providing custom links,
typically with XML, between its system and commonly used ERP
or e-commerce platforms. In theory, this should make it easier
for retailers to connect to the system through the Internet.
Large Stakes, Large Expenses
Automated, outsourced tax- collection systems may
insignificant today, but may prove to be a boon to states in
the future. States are currently forfeiting millions in tax
dollars--oftentimes due to Internet sales but not directly
from the merchants themselves.
In
the state of Wisconsin alone, E-commerce
sales to consumers are expected to grow from $290 million to
$386 million in 1999 to between $4.3 billion and $5.8 billion
in 2004. (The state's DOR website was unclear if ANY of these
estimated sales are being
taxed and collected.)
According
to Charles Collins, director of the sales and use tax division
at the North Carolina Department of Revenue, "North
Carolina misses out on $140 million in use taxes when North
Carolinians buy goods remotely from out-of-state businesses
and fail to pay use tax,."
"It
could be prohibitively expensive to require E-Businesses to
invest in their own tax compliance technology," Neils
insists. "A multi-state approach--in which third parties
are certified to manage tax compliance for E-businesses that
choose to use the service rather than handle tax compliance
alone--ultimately makes sense. "
Keep
me informed!
-find
out when more state E-Com taxation information becomes
available!
|
 |